Pentax SMC DA 21mm f/3.2 AL Limited - Review / Lab Test - Analysis
Lens Reviews -
Page 2 of 2
The DA 21mm f/3.2 produces a relatively pronounced degree of barrel distortion (~2%) - this is not dramatic but a bit higher than expected/desirable for a newly designed fix-focal lens.
This aspect cannot change just by using another Pentax DSLR so we copied the old findings here.
The DA 21mm f/3.2 is a dedicated APS-C lens and as such it tends to produce a comparatively higher degree of vignetting. At f/3.2 the problem is indeed more pronounced at 1.16EV. That's not extreme for a 21mm lens although not stellar either. The situation is already much better by f/4 and no longer field relevant from f/5.6 onwards.
The vignetting figures are slightly higher than in our initial test. This related to the different tone curve of the K5 vs the K10D. The vignetting tests are performed based on JPEGs in default settings.
The DA 21mm f/3.2 Limited produced very good although not superb resolution results in the MTF lab. The center performance is already exceptionally high straight from f/3.2 whereas the border quality isn't quite as high. At f/3.2-f/4 the borders show good results but the real boost towards very good quality occurs at f/5.6-f/8. At f/11 there's a general decrease in quality due to the usual diffraction effects.
Please note that the difference between f/3.2 and f/4 is only a 2/3 aperture so the gain in quality isn't overly pronounced between these two settings anyway.
Below is a simplified summary of the formal findings. The chart shows line widths
per picture height (LW/PH) which can be taken as a measure for sharpness.
If you want to know more about the MTF50 figures you may check out the corresponding
Chromatic Aberrations (CAs)
Lateral chromatic aberrations (color shadows at harsh contrast transitions) are well controlled for a lens in this focal length class. The average CA pixel width at the image borders stays around 0.7px - this may be visible here and there but usually not to an annoying degree.
Interestingly the CAs remain somewhat lower than in our initial test despite the higher megapixel count of the K5 - probably a sample variation effect.
You can find some sample images in the old review.