Pentax SMC-DA* 50-135mm f/2.8 ED [IF] SDM - Review / Test Report - Analysis
Lens Reviews -
Wednesday, 26 December 2007 07:54
Page 2 of 3
The DA* 50-135mm produces a moderate degree (~1.2%) of barrel distortion at 50mm changing
to moderate pincushion distortion (~1.1%) when zooming out to 135mm.
Move the mouse cursor over the focal length text marks below to observe the respective distortion
The chart above has a real-world size of about 120x80cm.
Typical for most dedicated APS-C lenses the vignetting is more pronounced
at wide-open aperture and the problem can be visible at f/2.8 at longer
focal lengths. At f/4 the vignetting is usually not field relevant
anymore and from f/5.6 onwards it's a rather negligible issue.
This is the 2nd tested sample of the DA* 50-135mm f/2.8. The first sample was very
sub-standard and the test report had to be canceled accordingly. This 2nd sample
performed much better although it is still not 100% perfect at 135mm.
At 50mm the center resolution is excellent straight from wide-open aperture and the
border quality is generally very good with an excellent peak at f/5.6. Even the extreme
corners remain on a very high level. At 90mm and 135mm there's a performance
drop at f/2.8 - less so in the center of the image field but the borders suffer somewhat
resulting in only "good" figures. There's a quality boost at f/4 and the peak is reached
at f/5.6 with an impressively high resolution across the frame.
Based on real world use I'd say that the performance of the lens deteriorates towards
close focus distances so better keep a distance of 1.5m+ (specifically combined with a
135mm setting). The quality of the otherwise very fine bokeh (out of focus blur) is also
Below is a simplified summary of the formal findings. The chart shows line widths
per picture height (LW/PH) which can be taken as a measure for sharpness.
If you want to know more about the MTF50 figures you may check out the corresponding
Chromatic Aberrations (CAs)
Similar to its Tokina cousin the Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8 suffers somewhat from high
chromatic aberrations (color shadows at harsh contrast transitions) at the extreme
ends of the zoom range. An average CA pixel width around 1.3px at the image borders
is not a disaster but it can be visible in some situations. Please note that CAs
can be significantly reduced via imaging tools (e.g. Photoshop CS2 or CS3).
Purple fringing seems relatively minimal. If pushed to the extremes you can produce
Longitudinal Chromatic Aberrations (tinted focus halos) but during normal use this
seems to be a non-issue.