Sigma AF 18-50mm f/2.8 EX DC macro - Review / Lab Test Report - Analysis
Lens Reviews - Nikon / Nikkor (APS-C)
Article Index


The 18-50mm EX shows the quite typical distortion characteristic for a lens in this class. At 18mm there is very pronounced barrel distortion which eases continuously towards the long end of the zoom range. At 35mm and 50mm the lens is basically free of distortion.

Move the mouse cursor over the focal length text marks below to observe the respective distortion
18mm 24mm 35mm 50mm

The chart above has a real-world size of about 120x80cm.


As mentioned the 18-50mm EX is a reduced image circle lens (APS-C) and typical for such lenses the vignetting is more pronounced compared to classic full frame lenses. Unsurprisingly the problem is most significant at f/2.8 at all focal lengths with a peak of 1.26EV at 18mm f/2.8. Generally it is a good idea to stop down to f/4 in situations where a high degree of vignetting could be disturbing.

MTF (resolution)

The Sigma AF 18-50mm f/2.8 EX DC macro exhibited a rather mixed performance in the MTF lab. The center performance is very good to excellent at all focal lengths. The weak spot of the lens is at 18mm where the extreme borders are soft at f/4 and more so at f/2.8. At medium apertures the lens is very sharp across the frame. At 24mm the extreme borders are better at large aperture settings but don´t really improve significantly when stopping down. At 35mm and 50mm the border resolution is generally very good.

The tested sample suffered a bit from a centering problem which probably affected the performance at large aperture settings to some degree.

Please note that the MTF results are not directly comparable across the different systems!

Below is a simplified summary of the formal findings. The chart shows line widths per picture height (LW/PH) which can be taken as a measure for sharpness. If you want to know more about the MTF50 figures you may check out the corresponding Imatest Explanations

Chromatic Aberrations (CAs)

Chromatic aberrations (color shadows at harsh contrast transitions) can be a problem at 18mm. The average CA pixel width at the image borders easily exceeds 1px with a peak at 18mm f/4 (~1.7px). This will be visible in some situations unless you correct the issue via an imaging application. The situation eases towards the long end of the zoom range and at 35mm and 50mm lateral CAs are very low even by critical standards.


Generally the Sigma AF 18-50mm f/2.8 EX DC macro delivered a solid performance but without being any better than the competition. The resolution results are generally very fine except at 18mm where the extreme border performance leaves something to be desired below f/5.6. Distortions as well as CAs are about in line with the rest of the gang. Typical for most dedicated APS-C lenses the vignetting could be a little better at wide-open aperture. The build quality and handling of the Sigma is fine. The Sigma offers lots of bangs for your bucks but the comparable Tamron AF 17-50mm f/2.8 SP seems to be a better alternative.

Optical Quality:    
Mechanical Quality:
   What does this mean ?

Disclosure: When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network and Google Adsense.